무료 등록 룰렛 룰_무료 등록 바카라오토프로그램_제안 바카라검증업체 https://www.google.com//bc5/2008/05/26/a-case-study-in-circular-reasoning-herman-cummings/ Tue, 30 Oct 2018 17:02:56 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.1.1 By: Richard Ramey https://www.google.com//bc5/2008/05/26/a-case-study-in-circular-reasoning-herman-cummings/comment-page-1/#comment-121325 Sat, 01 Dec 2012 16:58:56 +0000 /bc5/?p=2663#comment-121325 Yes, the arrogance part “Iam” ( was Gods name) “the only”.
Makes me think this guy is a quack . It turns people away and not even want to read what he has to say – on anything.

]]>
By: Mark Tiedemann https://www.google.com//bc5/2008/05/26/a-case-study-in-circular-reasoning-herman-cummings/comment-page-1/#comment-30103 Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:36:39 +0000 /bc5/?p=2663#comment-30103 Seems to me that humility is a quality of not taking credit for more than reality allows and sharing credit with those who deserve it. Also not expecting adulation for what you do. Moses, in my opinion, displayed genuine humility. Some of the later prophets, however, just hid behind Yahweh while they took on airs in "his name."

Calling one's self the foremost single authority on something exceeds the bounds of arrogance. While one may be, it's for others to point it out. But to take on such airs on a subject so indeterminately variable and rife with interpretive conjecture is kind of like bragging that you're the foremost authority on your own breathing.

]]>
By: Karl https://www.google.com//bc5/2008/05/26/a-case-study-in-circular-reasoning-herman-cummings/comment-page-1/#comment-30085 Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:43:21 +0000 /bc5/?p=2663#comment-30085 If anyone had spoken with Moses about Genesis 1 you probably would have gotten the same impression, yet Moses was called the humblest person around back then.

Humility is not thinking lowly or yourself. Moses on seveal occassions would have preferrred for God to take him out of the picture. That is not humility, that's thinking less of what God can actually do through you.

Humility is actuaslly thinking very highly of God, His word and the proper interpretive meaning for all mankind.

Those who interpret Genesis 1 as well as other Biblical passages in only the light of the context of their own pop culture are anything but humble.

]]>
By: Mark Tiedemann https://www.google.com//bc5/2008/05/26/a-case-study-in-circular-reasoning-herman-cummings/comment-page-1/#comment-30040 Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:00:32 +0000 /bc5/?p=2663#comment-30040 H.C. writes—"Lastly, by God’s grace, I am the “foremost terrestrial authority” on Genesis (as opposed to sub-terrestrials). I try to separate myself from other creationists (clowns) that do not convey the correct rendition of God’s Word."

No arrogance in your family, you got it all.

What, may I ask, is a sub-terrestrial?

]]>
By: Herman Cummings https://www.google.com//bc5/2008/05/26/a-case-study-in-circular-reasoning-herman-cummings/comment-page-1/#comment-30018 Thu, 13 Nov 2008 12:32:45 +0000 /bc5/?p=2663#comment-30018 Please Mr. Klarmann. If you are going to write about me, get your facts straight. I have been trying to get Louisiana to teach "the Observations of Moses", which is the oposing view of evolution.

But since no one there has responded, when a law suit is filed, I'm afraid that they will be left defenseless. They had their chance.

Herman Cummings

온라인 슬롯머신ephraim7@aol.com

]]>
By: Dan Klarmann https://www.google.com//bc5/2008/05/26/a-case-study-in-circular-reasoning-herman-cummings/comment-page-1/#comment-23366 Thu, 14 Aug 2008 11:29:02 +0000 /bc5/?p=2663#comment-23366 Herman Cummings is now pushing Louisiana to teach his own version of Evolution: 온라인 슬롯머신온라인 슬롯머신

]]>
By: Herman Cummings https://www.google.com//bc5/2008/05/26/a-case-study-in-circular-reasoning-herman-cummings/comment-page-1/#comment-18856 Tue, 27 May 2008 21:13:46 +0000 /bc5/?p=2663#comment-18856 Hello.

I read your article about me. Yes, I do not support "ID", and the false teachings of creation science, theistic evolution, and gap theories. Neither do I support the false conclusions of secular science.

But first, you mis-quote me is when you say " Herman Cummings is an active proponent of Biblical truth over Scientific Inquiry. I am a proponent of accepting scientific reality, and comparing it with Biblical Truth. I say that they will be identical, if you use the correct literal interpretation of Genesis.

Second, you give the impression that I revere the book I wrote as being the final authority. Not so. God's written Word is the final authority. My book conveys the correct exposition of Genesis. It even starts off with a list of biblical references, written out, so that the reader does not have to get a Bible to read them.

Lastly, by God's grace, I am the "foremost terrestrial authority" on Genesis (as opposed to sub-terrestrials). I try to separate myself from other creationists (clowns) that do not convey the correct rendition of God's Word.

Herman

ephraim7@aol.com

]]>